Comey testimony
Posted: Thu Jun 08, 2017 8:17 pm
....restricted, as I suspected, by not wishing to step on Mueller's feet, but still, we learned by day's end:
1. He made a moral judgement that the POTUS is a flat-out liar.
2. Sessions has been caught in at least one more Russian meeting that was not made public
3. There IS an active investigaton of Obstruction of Justice, and THAT does involve Trump directly, by definition
This thing is just STARTING to get into gear. As I stated, once Flynn panicked and sought immunity, the end game was on. Watergate is your guide, but with a slower, more complex set of crimes to investigate.
I could've sworn I read that Slappy felt Comey had committed some illegal act. I guess he pulled the thread. My question is what statute was violated? I mean, folks don't LIKE that he chose to let the NYT in on his memos, but they were; 1) not classified 2) authored by him and 3) transferred with his knowledge and approval to the press(see 1st amendment). No crime or even remotely close. I guess Slappy figured that out already......
1. He made a moral judgement that the POTUS is a flat-out liar.
2. Sessions has been caught in at least one more Russian meeting that was not made public
3. There IS an active investigaton of Obstruction of Justice, and THAT does involve Trump directly, by definition
This thing is just STARTING to get into gear. As I stated, once Flynn panicked and sought immunity, the end game was on. Watergate is your guide, but with a slower, more complex set of crimes to investigate.
I could've sworn I read that Slappy felt Comey had committed some illegal act. I guess he pulled the thread. My question is what statute was violated? I mean, folks don't LIKE that he chose to let the NYT in on his memos, but they were; 1) not classified 2) authored by him and 3) transferred with his knowledge and approval to the press(see 1st amendment). No crime or even remotely close. I guess Slappy figured that out already......