Pudfark wrote:This underlines/defines why you are not in business...Slick.
Cuz if you were?
You wouldn't be for long...with your "life model" and "give away" plan...
I've been in business since I was born, to some extent. And yourself? What business model have
you brought forth? I've managed to make money in banking, agriculture and real estate without
deviating from either my life model, nor cutting a break to those who deserved one. You've played
rent-a-thug to a Southern police force, by your own description of your policing practices. That's a business? Sounds like a beneficiary of government, to me.....
Old Pudfark sez: " Folks whut pays fer things?....Always takes better care of them things....than those what was gifted them.... "
and those who have less chance than others due merely to a birth into poverty, and a substandard
education system fall into which category? Other than ultimately falling victim to the police or settling
for a life of crime because no other gainful employment is available, they need viable options, and that
requires some government involvement. In the end, everyone wins.
Finally, in terms of the tax debate at hand, the matter isn't government handouts, or shouldn't be.
The public, by an massively overwhelming margin, supports medicare, medicaid, social security, unemployment
insurance and likes to have some government oversight of their food supply and medical practices. With the
current tax levels, which are historically very low, we cannot pay for those things. Something has to give.
Either we screw those folks who are fighting to survive and risk the overall health and safety of the populace, or we ask folks MORE than able to pay a bit more to do so, at rates comparable to what they used to pay, without complaint I might add. My tax bills are very small compared to the overall benefit to society of my paying them. You, likely, wouldn't even see much difference, from the descriptions you have given of your retired status. So, why are you whining?