A Complete Waste of Space

http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/ ... li=BBnb7Kz


that should blow the food budget. Of course, the money will be spent on Trump Steaks, Trump Doughnuts, etc

Quoting MSN again, you really are STUPID.

"Ya can't fix stupid"

If the name has MS in it, then it's Left Wing Communist propaganda.

So what is the difference between this and Obama being tied in with Ayers and Wright? It just looks like more hypocrisy to me!

Darkhorse wrote:So what is the difference between this and Obama being tied in with Ayers and Wright? It just looks like more hypocrisy to me!

It is. As you pointed out, one is a convicted commie bomber anarchist and the other is a loud mouth racist anarchist. I see your point.

Darkhorse wrote:So what is the difference between this and Obama being tied in with Ayers and Wright? It just looks like more hypocrisy to me!

could you explain how a link to a politician(Chris Christie) who publicly endorsed Trump equates to the made-up smear campaign around supposed 'close ties' with Ayers and Wright, neither of whom campaigned for Obama? I'm missing your equivalency, DH?

The so called "made-up smear campaign" is just spin to whitewash your side of the coin to make it look better than the other side when both sides are equally fucked up! The Dems and Repubs are heading for the same place just taking different roads, you boneheads are fighting each other while they are laughing all the way to the bank with your money!

as you know, DH, Hillary was hardly MY first choice. However, the Republican party, or more accurately, the segment behind Trump, are dangerous to the safety and stability of the nation. I'm not, as you might recall, prone to saying that about folks I merely disagree with. Didn't say so here about Romney, I DID suggest the same of Palin. Didn't call Bush such a danger, noting that we'd survived worse Presidents. And, so on. The choice here is stark, DH, and it isn't a case of arguing while some sinister machine continues unabated, either. It is a battle for whether we wish to represent our nation to the world as scared, angry and mean-spirited, or whether we wish to remain uniquely American: pluralistic, erring to the side of freedom over xenophobia, and conducting ourselves in a restrained and consistent manner on the world stage. Sadly, the GOP has made the choice of Hillary Clinton obvious. That might be sad, but will have to do........like I said about Bush........

callmeslick wrote:as you know, DH, Hillary was hardly MY first choice. However, the Republican party, or more accurately, the segment behind Trump, are dangerous to the safety and stability of the nation. I'm not, as you might recall, prone to saying that about folks I merely disagree with. Didn't say so here about Romney, I DID suggest the same of Palin. Didn't call Bush such a danger, noting that we'd survived worse Presidents. And, so on. The choice here is stark, DH, and it isn't a case of arguing while some sinister machine continues unabated, either. It is a battle for whether we wish to represent our nation to the world as scared, angry and mean-spirited, or whether we wish to remain uniquely American: pluralistic, erring to the side of freedom over xenophobia, and conducting ourselves in a restrained and consistent manner on the world stage. Sadly, the GOP has made the choice of Hillary Clinton obvious. That might be sad, but will have to do........like I said about Bush........

Pure horseshit and drivel. To wit: When you start believing that it's more important what the neighbors think....than what yer wife and children think...you're truly a fucktard and need to go live with the neighbors.